Discussion:
no posts?
(too old to reply)
Tim W
2011-09-17 22:28:19 UTC
Permalink
Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K

Tim W
taxi
2011-09-18 08:15:26 UTC
Permalink
You are not alone,
I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
than win vista and win 7.

taxi
Post by Tim W
Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
Tim W
Tim W
2011-09-19 08:21:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by taxi
You are not alone,
I am glad, thanks
Post by taxi
I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
than win vista and win 7.
I am just keeping an old laptop alive for occasional work at home. XP became
unusable with the updates and anti virus running, I have been round the
houses a bit with downgrading to ME, then dual booting different versions of
linux and Win98. Now seem to be settled on win2k which is working well.
Win2k is what the laptop had on it when it was new.

Tim W
Post by taxi
Post by Tim W
Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
Tim W
Acamas
2012-12-04 12:56:20 UTC
Permalink
Sure, you're not alone!



I'd even say: the W2K community is growing, since…

- It is a rock solid system

- It doesn't need loads of resources, and therefore…

- It runs on older machines, for about two decades, already (x386+)

- Though it’s a Windows system, it can be tweaked rather easily

- You can control background activities when surfing, e.g.

- Finally, yet importantly, there are tons of free, tested by millions of users, apps, tools, gadgets, etc. And you can still find old, well experienced proggers out there, so you will find a solution for almost any problem.



On the other hand,

- It needs more administrative activity to fine-tune the system for non-IT-professional use (i.e. for non-administrative users). However, it is possible. (And I guess, it's much easier than with a Linux system, anyway.)

- It's not harmless, in the hands of some kids or foreign IT professionals. ;-) But it's always the same with weapons: for the one, it is dangerous, and for the other one, it gives more security.



____________________________________________________________

"Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net> wrote in message news:j56u72$gle$***@dont-email.me...

|
| "taxi" <***@hOotmailNOT.com> wrote in message
| news:***@4ax.com...
|
| > You are not alone,
|
| I am glad, thanks
|
| > I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
| > than win vista and win 7.
| >
| I am just keeping an old laptop alive for occasional work at home. XP became
| unusable with the updates and anti virus running, I have been round the
| houses a bit with downgrading to ME, then dual booting different versions of
| linux and Win98. Now seem to be settled on win2k which is working well.
| Win2k is what the laptop had on it when it was new.
|
| Tim W
| >
| > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:28:19 +0100, "Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net>
| > wrote:
| >
| >>Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
| >>
| >>Tim W
| >>
Ver Tes
2012-12-20 10:37:48 UTC
Permalink
Ye.....


"Acamas" wrote in message news:k9ks1l$a8a$***@news.albasani.net...

Sure, you're not alone!



I'd even say: the W2K community is growing, since…

- It is a rock solid system

- It doesn't need loads of resources, and therefore…

- It runs on older machines, for about two decades, already (x386+)

- Though it’s a Windows system, it can be tweaked rather easily

- You can control background activities when surfing, e.g.

- Finally, yet importantly, there are tons of free, tested by millions of
users, apps, tools, gadgets, etc. And you can still find old, well
experienced proggers out there, so you will find a solution for almost any
problem.



On the other hand,

- It needs more administrative activity to fine-tune the system for
non-IT-professional use (i.e. for non-administrative users). However, it is
possible. (And I guess, it's much easier than with a Linux system, anyway.)

- It's not harmless, in the hands of some kids or foreign IT professionals.
;-) But it's always the same with weapons: for the one, it is dangerous, and
for the other one, it gives more security.



____________________________________________________________

"Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net> wrote in message news:j56u72$gle$***@dont-email.me...

|
| "taxi" <***@hOotmailNOT.com> wrote in message
| news:***@4ax.com...
|
| > You are not alone,
|
| I am glad, thanks
|
| > I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
| > than win vista and win 7.
| >
| I am just keeping an old laptop alive for occasional work at home. XP
became
| unusable with the updates and anti virus running, I have been round the
| houses a bit with downgrading to ME, then dual booting different versions
of
| linux and Win98. Now seem to be settled on win2k which is working well.
| Win2k is what the laptop had on it when it was new.
|
| Tim W
| >
| > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:28:19 +0100, "Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net>
| > wrote:
| >
| >>Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
| >>
| >>Tim W
| >>
|
|


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
Ver Tes
2013-01-16 12:42:02 UTC
Permalink
hiiiii

"Ver Tes" wrote in message news:kauppv$lp$***@adenine.netfront.net...

Ye.....


"Acamas" wrote in message news:k9ks1l$a8a$***@news.albasani.net...

Sure, you're not alone!



I'd even say: the W2K community is growing, since…

- It is a rock solid system

- It doesn't need loads of resources, and therefore…

- It runs on older machines, for about two decades, already (x386+)

- Though it’s a Windows system, it can be tweaked rather easily

- You can control background activities when surfing, e.g.

- Finally, yet importantly, there are tons of free, tested by millions of
users, apps, tools, gadgets, etc. And you can still find old, well
experienced proggers out there, so you will find a solution for almost any
problem.



On the other hand,

- It needs more administrative activity to fine-tune the system for
non-IT-professional use (i.e. for non-administrative users). However, it is
possible. (And I guess, it's much easier than with a Linux system, anyway.)

- It's not harmless, in the hands of some kids or foreign IT professionals.
;-) But it's always the same with weapons: for the one, it is dangerous, and
for the other one, it gives more security.



____________________________________________________________

"Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net> wrote in message news:j56u72$gle$***@dont-email.me...

|
| "taxi" <***@hOotmailNOT.com> wrote in message
| news:***@4ax.com...
|
| > You are not alone,
|
| I am glad, thanks
|
| > I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
| > than win vista and win 7.
| >
| I am just keeping an old laptop alive for occasional work at home. XP
became
| unusable with the updates and anti virus running, I have been round the
| houses a bit with downgrading to ME, then dual booting different versions
of
| linux and Win98. Now seem to be settled on win2k which is working well.
| Win2k is what the laptop had on it when it was new.
|
| Tim W
| >
| > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:28:19 +0100, "Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net>
| > wrote:
| >
| >>Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
| >>
| >>Tim W
| >>
|
|


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
Ver Tes
2013-01-16 13:00:05 UTC
Permalink
NNTP....

"Ver Tes" wrote in message news:kd677l$298p$***@adenine.netfront.net...




hiiiii

"Ver Tes" wrote in message news:kauppv$lp$***@adenine.netfront.net...

Ye.....


"Acamas" wrote in message news:k9ks1l$a8a$***@news.albasani.net...

Sure, you're not alone!



I'd even say: the W2K community is growing, since…

- It is a rock solid system

- It doesn't need loads of resources, and therefore…

- It runs on older machines, for about two decades, already (x386+)

- Though it’s a Windows system, it can be tweaked rather easily

- You can control background activities when surfing, e.g.

- Finally, yet importantly, there are tons of free, tested by millions of
users, apps, tools, gadgets, etc. And you can still find old, well
experienced proggers out there, so you will find a solution for almost any
problem.



On the other hand,

- It needs more administrative activity to fine-tune the system for
non-IT-professional use (i.e. for non-administrative users). However, it is
possible. (And I guess, it's much easier than with a Linux system, anyway.)

- It's not harmless, in the hands of some kids or foreign IT professionals.
;-) But it's always the same with weapons: for the one, it is dangerous, and
for the other one, it gives more security.



____________________________________________________________

"Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net> wrote in message news:j56u72$gle$***@dont-email.me...

|
| "taxi" <***@hOotmailNOT.com> wrote in message
| news:***@4ax.com...
|
| > You are not alone,
|
| I am glad, thanks
|
| > I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
| > than win vista and win 7.
| >
| I am just keeping an old laptop alive for occasional work at home. XP
became
| unusable with the updates and anti virus running, I have been round the
| houses a bit with downgrading to ME, then dual booting different versions
of
| linux and Win98. Now seem to be settled on win2k which is working well.
| Win2k is what the laptop had on it when it was new.
|
| Tim W
| >
| > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:28:19 +0100, "Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net>
| > wrote:
| >
| >>Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
| >>
| >>Tim W
| >>
|
|


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
Acamas
2013-01-20 13:55:26 UTC
Permalink
Hi Ver Tes! :)

--
________________________________________________________________________
"Ver Tes" <***@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:kd677l$298p$***@adenine.netfront.net...
|
|
|
| hiiiii
|
| "Ver Tes" wrote in message news:kauppv$lp$***@adenine.netfront.net...
|
| Ye.....
|
|
| "Acamas" wrote in message news:k9ks1l$a8a$***@news.albasani.net...
|
| Sure, you're not alone!
|
|
|
| I'd even say: the W2K community is growing, since…
|
| - It is a rock solid system
|
| - It doesn't need loads of resources, and therefore…
|
| - It runs on older machines, for about two decades, already (x386+)
|
| - Though it’s a Windows system, it can be tweaked rather easily
|
| - You can control background activities when surfing, e.g.
|
| - Finally, yet importantly, there are tons of free, tested by millions of
| users, apps, tools, gadgets, etc. And you can still find old, well
| experienced proggers out there, so you will find a solution for almost any
| problem.
|
|
|
| On the other hand,
|
| - It needs more administrative activity to fine-tune the system for
| non-IT-professional use (i.e. for non-administrative users). However, it is
| possible. (And I guess, it's much easier than with a Linux system, anyway.)
|
| - It's not harmless, in the hands of some kids or foreign IT professionals.
| ;-) But it's always the same with weapons: for the one, it is dangerous, and
| for the other one, it gives more security.
|
|
|
| ____________________________________________________________
|
| "Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net> wrote in message
| news:j56u72$gle$***@dont-email.me...
|
| |
| | "taxi" <***@hOotmailNOT.com> wrote in message
| | news:***@4ax.com...
| |
| | > You are not alone,
| |
| | I am glad, thanks
| |
| | > I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
| | > than win vista and win 7.
| | >
| | I am just keeping an old laptop alive for occasional work at home. XP
| became
| | unusable with the updates and anti virus running, I have been round the
| | houses a bit with downgrading to ME, then dual booting different versions
| of
| | linux and Win98. Now seem to be settled on win2k which is working well.
| | Win2k is what the laptop had on it when it was new.
| |
| | Tim W
| | >
| | > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:28:19 +0100, "Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net>
| | > wrote:
| | >
| | >>Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
| | >>
| | >>Tim W
| | >>
| |
| |
|
|
| --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
|
|
| --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfro

Ver Tes
2012-12-20 10:40:19 UTC
Permalink
Hi,

Yes.. Sure





"Acamas" wrote in message news:k9ks1l$a8a$***@news.albasani.net...

Sure, you're not alone!



I'd even say: the W2K community is growing, since…

- It is a rock solid system

- It doesn't need loads of resources, and therefore…

- It runs on older machines, for about two decades, already (x386+)

- Though it’s a Windows system, it can be tweaked rather easily

- You can control background activities when surfing, e.g.

- Finally, yet importantly, there are tons of free, tested by millions of
users, apps, tools, gadgets, etc. And you can still find old, well
experienced proggers out there, so you will find a solution for almost any
problem.



On the other hand,

- It needs more administrative activity to fine-tune the system for
non-IT-professional use (i.e. for non-administrative users). However, it is
possible. (And I guess, it's much easier than with a Linux system, anyway.)

- It's not harmless, in the hands of some kids or foreign IT professionals.
;-) But it's always the same with weapons: for the one, it is dangerous, and
for the other one, it gives more security.



____________________________________________________________

"Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net> wrote in message news:j56u72$gle$***@dont-email.me...

|
| "taxi" <***@hOotmailNOT.com> wrote in message
| news:***@4ax.com...
|
| > You are not alone,
|
| I am glad, thanks
|
| > I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
| > than win vista and win 7.
| >
| I am just keeping an old laptop alive for occasional work at home. XP
became
| unusable with the updates and anti virus running, I have been round the
| houses a bit with downgrading to ME, then dual booting different versions
of
| linux and Win98. Now seem to be settled on win2k which is working well.
| Win2k is what the laptop had on it when it was new.
|
| Tim W
| >
| > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:28:19 +0100, "Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net>
| > wrote:
| >
| >>Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
| >>
| >>Tim W
| >>
|
|


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
Ver Tes
2012-12-20 12:16:47 UTC
Permalink
yes.................

"Acamas" wrote in message news:k9ks1l$a8a$***@news.albasani.net...

Sure, you're not alone!



I'd even say: the W2K community is growing, since…

- It is a rock solid system

- It doesn't need loads of resources, and therefore…

- It runs on older machines, for about two decades, already (x386+)

- Though it’s a Windows system, it can be tweaked rather easily

- You can control background activities when surfing, e.g.

- Finally, yet importantly, there are tons of free, tested by millions of
users, apps, tools, gadgets, etc. And you can still find old, well
experienced proggers out there, so you will find a solution for almost any
problem.



On the other hand,

- It needs more administrative activity to fine-tune the system for
non-IT-professional use (i.e. for non-administrative users). However, it is
possible. (And I guess, it's much easier than with a Linux system, anyway.)

- It's not harmless, in the hands of some kids or foreign IT professionals.
;-) But it's always the same with weapons: for the one, it is dangerous, and
for the other one, it gives more security.



____________________________________________________________

"Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net> wrote in message news:j56u72$gle$***@dont-email.me...

|
| "taxi" <***@hOotmailNOT.com> wrote in message
| news:***@4ax.com...
|
| > You are not alone,
|
| I am glad, thanks
|
| > I still use win2k on an old offline test puter.It still works better
| > than win vista and win 7.
| >
| I am just keeping an old laptop alive for occasional work at home. XP
became
| unusable with the updates and anti virus running, I have been round the
| houses a bit with downgrading to ME, then dual booting different versions
of
| linux and Win98. Now seem to be settled on win2k which is working well.
| Win2k is what the laptop had on it when it was new.
|
| Tim W
| >
| > On Sat, 17 Sep 2011 23:28:19 +0100, "Tim W" <***@mtavirgin.net>
| > wrote:
| >
| >>Makes me feel like a bit of an oddball still working with W2K
| >>
| >>Tim W
| >>
|
|


--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ***@netfront.net ---
Loading...